Interview with Melissa Doré (Full Transcript)

Introduction by Dmitry

Wonderful. We have a beautiful nice guest today, Melissa Doré. And you will tell us more about yourself a little bit later, but let me start sharing the screen because we would like to get introduced.

Okay. So I call myself also not just Dmitry but I also sometimes myself IVIM or I.V.I.M. which stands for many things but one of them is independently valid validated information.

And in there is a page about and you can read a little bit about myself Dmitry Gorodnichy and about IVIM and web is IVIM.ca. So and indeed I use this portal to collect evidence about truth, you know truth which for whatever reasons is not easily available or even is hidden sometimes.

So I'm a data scientist myself. So I have developed myself a number of web applications to collect and visualize data. And I also just collect evidence from other sources from FOI, freedom of information from for example from a tips and OPQ and you know I try to get it organized mainly for myself because sometimes I find it useful when I talk to neighbors or when I talk to my colleagues for example where I work.

And yeah and to help other people who also need to share information. And what we will be doing today with Melissa, we'll be showing her how for you Melissa to you can set a similar website. It's the same technology. It's called Google site and I will show it to you how to use it.

But that's my website and here you would see links to my substacks. I have a number of substacks here. One is called IVIM substack and the other one is DG4VP substack. And one of them is about information for the members of my union.

So last year I was elected for my union executive, that's a separate story, and I was running for vice president position there. I have lots of support from members for many things I'm doing here.

So and this is who can tell me the truth. So all of this is about truth and nothing but the truth as we say but essentially we are just trying to find something to help us to move forward in a positive constructive way.

And for example my last article was about Sean Hartman. This is a very very tragic story of a young boy who just died after he got his vaccine shot. Unbelievable. His dad is crying every day. Every day, you know, he says like 14 43 days without Sean. Every day he posted on Twitter.

And this system everyone you know no one would love to be jailed for killing a boy and they will do whatever they can to hide who is responsible, whose actions or whose lack of action has led to the killing of an innocent beautiful boy.

And there is a website, website is Answers for Sean and this website is also built using the same technology called Google site and you'd see it's kind of the same idea you have menus there and you could have video and he uses my video which I put on YouTube of this boy singing Beatles Help he's five years of age here. I was crying here.

It's really really tragic what happens but we can help him. We can help other people who have suffered from the mandates, from lies, from side effects. Maybe they're helping someone but these vaccines but they are not helping some other people and let's be honest about that.

So that's my little story here. My website idm.ca. And you can learn more about me from different websites which are linked here. And this is my other website you know just more about my scientific work which I'm not talking about here.

Passing to Melissa

But now let's move to your story. So we will be helping you to set your page Melissa Doré and I kind of started helping you with a design. I suggested that you would also create your newsletter which would be Substack and currently there is no Substack but you will be able to create it something like melissador.substack.com similar to the way I have set up my Substack here.

And yes and you will be able to put all the information which I know you've gathered about your experiences and knowledge which you've collected.

So Melissa, the floor is yours as you say and you can just, yeah, please introduce yourself.

Melissa’s Introduction

Melissa: Thank you so much, Dmitry. So again, I'm Melissa Doré. I am a former nurse practitioner. My license to practice nursing was revoked in March of 2025 of this year.

Because I in September of 2021 until February of 2022, I developed and put on an online education session for those who were interested in receiving more information about COVID-19 vaccines.

And what I did was I presented information that I derived from Pfizer and Moderna product monographs. So that's the developers of the vaccines. Their product monographs are a document that clinicians can refer to to get the most up-to-date information about any medical product.

And so I used that information and built an online Zoom presentation that I delivered to those who were interested. And once they learned the information and they chose to decline the COVID-19 vaccine, I gave them a letter stating that I taught them the information and as a result they are declining the COVID-19 vaccine based on informed consent.

And so me doing that nursing action got my license to practice nursing revoked.

Children, Mandates, and Risks

It's so ironic that you share Sean's story because a lot of the individuals that I served in this online education session were some children, some teenagers above the age of 12 that were in September of 2021 being mandated to take the COVID-19 vaccine to continue to participate in their sport.

And so I did have a few hockey young men and then I did provide the education session to them and gave them their certificate so that they could hopefully continue with their soccer or their hockey without having to take this product that had no long-term safety data.

It's so sad to hear Sean Hartman—his story—because young people were not at a particularly high risk of harm if they contracted the COVID-19 virus. And so them having to have been mandated to take a vaccine that they would likely have done well without having the vaccine, and then the potential harms that arose from that, is so heartbreaking.

Because we know that young men in particular are at higher risk of developing myocarditis with taking this vaccine as opposed to having the natural virus.

***

Fighting Back: Appeal and Ethics

So that is my story essentially. There are so many different layers to my story and I'm not taking this revocation of my license lying down. I'm definitely fighting and advocating for myself.

I'm self-represented in my appeal of that decision to revoke my license and will be going before three provincial justices, presenting evidence. Let's see if they believe that me providing education to those interested and a certificate to prove that education had taken place is considered professional misconduct worthy of a penalty of revoking my license to earn a living which took me over nine years to earn.

It's been a very challenging journey. I haven't been able to earn since February of 2022. As a result, I've lost everything that I've accumulated materially. But I have no regrets because I firmly believe that I did the right thing, upholding medical ethics that seemed to go by the wayside during that period.

And I have the Nuremberg Code—the guidelines for human experimentation—to support my endeavor. The first rule of that code is that no individual should be coerced, enticed, or forced to participate in an experiment.

And quite frankly, the COVID-19 vaccines, without any long-term safety data, were experimental. Right now we are learning what happens four years after taking these products.

Evidence and Pfizer Papers

Dmitry: And I'm showing on the screen right now Naomi Wolf presenting the findings from the Pfizer Papers at the European Union Parliament. Lots of data is documented, and you can get this book now on Amazon.

For each side effect, it links directly to Pfizer's own internal documents showing the numbers. And they tried to hide those numbers.

Again, here I have a number of publications. This is kind of a hypothetical analysis of comparing Nazi experiments on reproduction and sterilization with some research. I'm not saying Pfizer is doing that. I'm just providing some interesting parallels.

Because indeed when you hear that they put a lot of effort in research on reproduction harms by their products, you just wonder: why is there such a strong desire from Pfizer on reproduction harms?

And again, there are a couple of articles posted here. It's part of the evidence which I put on my website. It's all there. These are quotes from the Pfizer papers—reproductive harms for example, miscarriages, and so on.

Contradictions in Official Guidance

Melissa: While you're speaking on that—just very quickly—in September of 2021, after reading the Pfizer and Moderna product monographs, it said very clearly on each of them that the safety and efficacy of these products had not been established for pregnant and lactating women.

So I couldn’t understand how the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada were saying that this product was safe and effective for pregnant women, when the developers of these products did not declare that in their monographs.

It was very difficult for me. A lot of clinicians read the product monographs because at the bedside they were intentionally left blank. But online you could retrieve them. So yes, that’s further to your point.

The Importance of Public Access

Dmitry: And indeed, from what I understand, you have all those monographs, you have documents already gathered. So why not allow other Canadians and people worldwide to read for themselves what was written?

It’s not about politicians or even medical doctors telling you what to do. You can read the source yourself.

So it's very important what you're doing, Melissa. Your work will help many other people read for themselves what is known about these products.

I'm not an expert in the medical field, but I'm curious to know what’s written there. The Pfizer Papers are also a very important source of documents—about 1,300 pages, publicly available. Anyone can read them.

The problem is that not many people have the desire to dig into that much information. Even more, if you're comfortable with what you have, you don't want to become uncomfortable. Unfortunately, the majority will keep living the way they live, comfortable and unaffected.

But we also know that batches varied drastically. Some batches were a thousand times more unsafe than others. About 5% of people who got those unsafe batches experienced severe side effects or even died. The other 90–95% may still believe the vaccines were safe.

Long-Term Unknowns

Melissa: But long-term safety data though, Dmitry—long-term safety data still hasn’t been established.

Dmitry: Right, indeed. That’s why it’s important to read the original Pfizer research. The Pfizer Papers talk a lot about reproductive harms, cardiovascular issues, cancer-related risks.

So even those 95% or 90% or 80% who don’t have side effects now—who knows what will happen later?

And I honestly hope that those products are not as bad overall as those 5% of the worst batches.

***

Appeal Process and Civil Suits

Dmitry: So just to recap your story, where are you right now? What is your situation? When is your hearing? What is the timeline?

Melissa: We have just started the appeal process. Right now, I have a deadline of presenting all of my information—basically my factum—the information I intend to rely on in my appeal.

I must present it to the defendant. Now, in the appeal, I am on the offense and the College of Nurses of Ontario is on the defense. I must present my information by early October—in the next couple of days.

Then they have two months to respond. After that, the appeal will be scheduled. I anticipate March 2026 is when the appeal will be heard.

I also have other civil matters I’ve undertaken as a self-represented plaintiff. I was a member of the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO). One main feature of membership was that if the College of Nurses investigated a nurse’s practice, they would be entitled to a lawyer.

But the RNAO withheld a lawyer from me until the very last days of my hearing. They only approved a lawyer when I didn’t need one anymore. Importantly, this was after I filed a civil suit against them.

So I now have two civil suits against the RNAO. With them withholding a lawyer, I lost my entire career, livelihood, and ability to care for myself and my family. It had a devastating financial impact.

They worked symbiotically and simultaneously with the College to make my life very difficult—making it harder for me to defend myself.

Support and Public Awareness

Dmitry: We will include any links you wish, so people can donate or learn more about your story. You will be able to put all of that on your website, and I’ll publicize it in my newsletters and on YouTube.

Now maybe we can proceed to the practical training on how to build the website. At this point, I’ll stop the recording—but I want to ask: how do you live now? How big is your family?

Melissa: I’m a single mom. My marriage ended in 2018. I have three children. My eldest is on her own. But the younger two I was responsible for.

My ex-husband had to take over care for my middle child. My youngest elected to stay with me. We were essentially homeless since April 2024.

By the grace of God and a kind former patient, we were taken in. Angels have come forward to help us survive.

I’ve been crippled—not able to earn from the skill I spent years developing—nursing. It’s been very challenging.

Faith and Resilience

Dmitry: Indeed. It’s heartbreaking how a dedicated, skillful professional who never committed crimes, who only tried to do good, is treated this way.

We talk about Sean Hartman’s tragedy, but your story shows what’s done to good people—just good people.

If I can help in any way, I will. Many Canadians, Americans, and others around the world will support you.

What keeps you strong? What propels you forward?

Melissa: It’s nothing but our Creator God. I wouldn’t be here without His support. I can testify to repeated miracles.

It was God’s inspiration that encouraged me to offer the education session, to allow people to gain more information about the COVID-19 vaccines so they could decline with informed consent.

I’ve adopted practices to stay sane:

• Meditation (since June 2020).

• At least an hour daily in nature (since October 2020).

• Exercise regularly.

• Eat clean.

Those four things have really helped me through this craziness.

Closing Gratitude

Dmitry: That’s very inspiring, Melissa. Many who faced these challenges showed who they are: good people who chose what they believed was right.

You may have even saved lives by preventing some from exposure to bad batches. We never know, but maybe this is a step forward for all of us.

Thank you again. We’ll now switch to the technical training.

Melissa: Before we end, I want to thank you. Each of us has a different skill set. If we bring our skills together, we can accomplish anything.

I’m very grateful for what you’re doing—you are helping a lot of people. Thank you for having me on this platform, for helping me develop my website, and for everything you’re doing for all of us who’ve faced challenges and need a place to have our voices heard.

Dmitry: By doing good things, you give energy back—to me and to others. It fills life with meaning. I’m grateful to people like you for bringing value to my life too.