This site is being redesigned to better preserve the evidence and arguments related to My Hearing.

Hearing Proceedings

Exhibits

File No and Name: 566-02-48305 - Dmitry Gorodnichy & Canada Border Services Agency

LIST OF EXHIBITS FILED ENTERED BY LISTES DES PIECES JUSTIFICATIVES PRODUITES PAR : Grievor

Download all exhibits entered by Grievor at https://ivim.ca/hearing/exhibits

Key Evidence

G-20. See also: G-23 1. CHANGE IN WORDING: REMOVAL OF “SMALL”Search for the phrase “percentage of the” throughout the archived PHAC reports between July 2021 and February 2022.Observe how, starting in December 2021 (page 114), the word “small” disappeared from the following sentence:“There is still a [small] percentage of the population who are vaccinated that will still be infected with COVID-19.”2. STEADY INCREASE IN THE PERCENTAGE OF COVID-19 DEATHS AMONG THE “FULLY PROTECTED”Observe the monotonically increasing percentage of COVID-19 deaths among “fully protected” in Figure 5:

1.2% as of June 10, 2021 (page 17)
5.8% as of October 2, 2021 (page 42)
7.9% as of October 30, 2021 (page 66)
10.2% as of December 18, 2021 (page 114) — the word “small” was removed from the sentence cited above.
19.5% as of January 22, 2022 (page 143)

3. ADDITIONAL ANALYSISPages 90–91 contain tables and plots automatically generated from the statistics published by PHAC.4. ARCHIVED SOURCE REPORTSAll published PHAC reports have been archived in the open-canada/vitals GitHub repository:https://github.com/open-canada/vitals/tree/main/docs/COVID-19%20epidemiology%20updates (the screenshot of which is shown on page 76)

G-21

New evidence submitted on October 22, 2026 – 1st Book of documents pg. 90 - Provisional deaths and excess mortality in Canada

G-23

New evidence submitted by email on October 22, 2026 – question and response tabled in the House of Commons on April 13, 2026, as Sessional Paper 8555-451-849

Official response to House of Commons Question Q-849, tabled April 13, 2026, Sessional Paper 8555-451-849.

The Government of Canada acknowledged presenting comparative statistics of COVID-19 deaths by vaccination status using “cumulative” counts that included outcomes recorded before vaccine doses were administered, which artificially inflated the number of deaths among unvaccinated individuals when compared on a weekly basis with deaths among vaccinated individuals.

Notably, when these comparative numbers were presented in publicly facing weekly reports, the word “cumulative” was never mentioned in connection with the published figures.

The publication of cumulative rather than weekly counts was justified on the grounds of “privacy” concerns. However, weekly counts can be trivially derived from cumulative counts by subtracting the figures in consecutive weekly reports, and vice versa. Therefore, this justification cannot be accepted as a valid explanation.

See also: Exhibit G-20 — Archived weekly PHAC COVID-19 Epidemiology Updates (August 2021 – February 2022).

Page updated

Google Sites

Report abuse